Detalle de: Innovation versus practice in biological crystallization
| Title | Innovation versus practice in biological crystallization |
| Abstract |
Edward Snell, of the Hauptmann Woodward Institute in Buffalo, NY has a great introduction to his talks on crystallization Without crystals, there is no crystallography – without crystallography, there are no crystallographers. This succinctly points out the direct relationship between crystal growth and our professional livelihood. And yet, despite that, there is little concerted effort at getting better at growing well diffracting crystals. Looking back over the last 50 years of macromolecular crystal growth, there have been arguably only four game changers – the introduction of polyethylene glycols (PEGs) as precipitants (1970s) (McPherson, 1976); the introduction of pre-mixed crystallization screens (1990s) (Jancarik & Kim, 1991); the commercialization of automation (2000s) (Shaw Stewart & Mueller-Dieckman |
| Apa Reference | Newman, J., & van Raaij, M. J. (2020). Innovation versus practice in biological crystallization. Acta Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology Communications, 76(7), 290–291. 10.1107/s2053230x20008869 |
| Doi | 10.1107/S2053230X20008869 |
| Publication Date | 1 Jul 2020 |
| Publication Type | Article |
| Researcher | Mark van Raaij |
| Ontology | Experimental structure determination |
| Research Groups | Structural Biology of Virus Proteins |
| Tools |
