This site is under development. For the current active site, go to bcbhub.csic.es.

Orcid Publication

Detalle de: Innovation versus practice in biological crystallization

Title Innovation versus practice in biological crystallization
Abstract

Edward Snell, of the Hauptmann Woodward Institute in Buffalo, NY has a great introduction to his talks on crystallization Without crystals, there is no crystallography – without crystallography, there are no crystallographers. This succinctly points out the direct relationship between crystal growth and our professional livelihood. And yet, despite that, there is little concerted effort at getting better at growing well diffracting crystals. Looking back over the last 50 years of macromolecular crystal growth, there have been arguably only four game changers – the introduction of polyethylene glycols (PEGs) as precipitants (1970s) (McPherson, 1976); the introduction of pre-mixed crystallization screens (1990s) (Jancarik & Kim, 1991); the commercialization of automation (2000s) (Shaw Stewart & Mueller-Dieckman

Apa Reference Newman, J., & van Raaij, M. J. (2020). Innovation versus practice in biological crystallization. Acta Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology Communications, 76(7), 290–291. 10.1107/s2053230x20008869
Doi 10.1107/S2053230X20008869
Publication Date 1 Jul 2020
Publication Type Article
Researcher Mark van Raaij
Ontology Experimental structure determination
Research Groups Structural Biology of Virus Proteins
Tools

Suggest changes

Publications are synced automatically from ORCID, so they can't be edited here directly. Spotted something wrong? Let us know below and we'll take care of it.

← Return to Home