This site is under development. For the current active site, go to bcbhub.csic.es.

Orcid Publication

Detalle de: A comparison of clinical and food Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates on the basis of potential virulence factors

Title A comparison of clinical and food Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates on the basis of potential virulence factors
Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most widely used yeast in industrial/commercial food and beverage production and is even consumed as a nutritional supplement. Various cases of fungemia caused by this yeast species in severely debilitated traumatized or immune-deficient patients have been reported in recent years, suggesting that this species could be an opportunistic pathogen in such patients. To determine whether the industrial S. cerevisiae strains can be included in this virulent group of strains, we carried out a comparative study between clinical and industrial yeasts based on the various phenotypic traits associated with pathogenicity in two other yeast species (Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans). The majority of the clinical isolates were found to secrete higher levels of protease and phospholipase, grow better at 42 degrees C and show strong pseudohyphal growth relative to industrial yeasts. However three industrial yeast strains, one commercial wine strain, baker's yeast and one commercial strain of S. cerevisiae (var. boulardii), were exceptions and based on their physiological traits these yeasts would appear to be related to clinical strains.

Apa Reference de Llanos, R., Fernández-Espinar, M.T. & Querol, A. (2006). A comparison of clinical and food Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates on the basis of potential virulence factors. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 90(3), 221-231. 10.1007/s10482-006-9077-7
Doi 10.1007/s10482-006-9077-7
Publication Date 27 Jul 2006
Publication Type Article
Researcher Amparo Querol
Ontology Model organisms
Research Groups
Tools

Suggest changes

Publications are synced automatically from ORCID, so they can't be edited here directly. Spotted something wrong? Let us know below and we'll take care of it.

← Return to Home