(cryo-EM) Validation Report Service
Cryo-electron microscopy is currently one of the most active techniques in Structural Biology. The number of maps deposited at the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) is rapidly growing every year and keeping the quality of the submitted maps is essential to maintain the scientific quality of the field.
The ultimate quality measure is the consistency of the map and an atomic model. However, this is only possible for high resolution maps. Over the years there have been many suggestions about validation measures of 3DEM maps. Unfortunately, most of these measures are not currently in use for their spread in multiple software tools and the associated difficulty to access them. To alleviate this problem, we made available through this website a validation grading system that evaluate the information provided to assess the map.
This system grades a map from 0 to 5 depending on the amount of information available. In this way, a map could be validated at Level 0 (the deposited map), 1 (two half maps), 2 (2D classes), 3 (particles), 4 (angular assignment), 5 (micro graphs and coordinates). In addition, we can have three optional qualifiers: A (… + atomic model), W (… + image processing workflow), and O (… + other techniques).
Basic Information
| Repository | https://biocomp.cnb.csic.es/EMValidationService/ |
| Documentation | https://biocomp.cnb.csic.es/EMValidationService/help/ |
| Main publication (DOI) | 10.1039/d2fd00059h view |
| Contact email | isanchez@cnb.csic.es |
| Authors/Maintainers | Carlos Oscar Sorzano, Jose María Salvador Carazo Garcia |
| Type of application | Web-service |
| Programming languages | PythonJavaScriptMySQL |
| Keywords | Computational Methods, Structural bioinformatics, Experimental structure determination, Structure prediction |
Technical details
| Input file formats | mmCIF |
| Output file formats | json, pdf |
| Software compatibility | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Hardware requirements | |
| Type of containerization | Docker |
| Wrapper type | |
| Compatible tools | |
| Funding resource | EU funding, National competitive funding, Regional/local competitive funding |
| Funding support | No funding |
Statistics
| Unique users (last 12 months) | |
| Unique users (since first release) | |
| Software downloads (last 12 months) | |
| Software downloads (since first release) | |
| Jobs submitted (last 12 months) | |
| Jobs submitted (since first release) | |
| Repository clones (last 12 months) | |
| Repository clones (since first release) | |
| Citations (last 12 months) | <100 (~1 as of 15/10/2026) |
| Citations (since first release) | <100 (3 as of 15/10/2026) |
| Early-stage researcher effort (development) | |
| Early-stage researcher effort (maintenance) | |
| Technician-supported effort (development) | |
| Technician-supported effort (maintenance) | |
| Other effort (development) | |
| Other effort (maintenance) | |
| Total effort (development) | |
| Total effort (maintenance) |
