This site is under development. For the current active site, go to bcbhub.csic.es.

Orcid Publication

Detalle de: A Genome-Wide Association Study of Female Sexual Dysfunction

Title A Genome-Wide Association Study of Female Sexual Dysfunction
Abstract

Background Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) is an important but controversial problem with serious negative impact on women's quality of life. Data from twin studies have shown a genetic contribution to the development and maintenance of FSD. Methodology/principal findings We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on 2.5 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 1,104 female twins (25-81 years of age) in a population-based register and phenotypic data on lifelong sexual functioning. Although none reached conventional genome-wide level of significance (10 × -8), we found strongly suggestive associations with the phenotypic dimension of arousal (rs13202860, P = 1.2 × 10(-7); rs1876525, P = 1.2 × 10(-7); and rs13209281 P = 8.3 × 10(-7)) on chromosome 6, around 500 kb upstream of the locus HTR1E (5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1E) locus, related to the serotonin brain pathways. We could not replicate previously reported candidate SNPs associated with FSD in the DRD4, 5HT2A and IL-1B loci. Conclusions/significance We report the first GWAS of FSD symptoms in humans. This has pointed to several "risk alleles" and the implication of the serotonin and GABA pathways. Ultimately, understanding key mechanisms via this research may lead to new FSD treatments and inform clinical practice and developments in psychiatric nosology.

Apa Reference Burri, A., Hysi, P., Clop, A., Rahman, Q., & Spector, T. D. (2012). A Genome-Wide Association Study of Female Sexual Dysfunction. PLoS ONE, 7(4), e35041. 10.1371/journal.pone.0035041
Doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0035041
Publication Date 11 Apr 2012
Publication Type Article
Researcher Alexandre Clop i Ponte
Ontology Genomics, Population genomics
Research Groups Animal genomics
Tools

Suggest changes

Publications are synced automatically from ORCID, so they can't be edited here directly. Spotted something wrong? Let us know below and we'll take care of it.

← Return to Home